A man is a rape-supporter if
|
|
Post by t⊗theark on May 27, 2011 6:59:31 GMT
Strip away our technology... Mat we also strip away a beaver's dam or a termites nest? You are animals and by animals, we are; Kingdom: Animalia Phylum: Chordata Class: Mammalia Order: Primates Family: Hominidae Genus: Homo Species: Homo sapiens You deficate, we eat and we have the urge to have sex. You are placental mammals! Your brain takes up the same energy to light a filament light bulb and tales up 75% of your head! Get some sugar, set it on fire and every 3 second you'll see the energy required a day. You lost our hair to have the most unique cooling systems in the animal kingdom - sweating. You have left your planet's atmosphere 100 year after who learned how to fly and it's predicted in another 100 years time, if you don't tear yourself apart in your sentient stupidity, have the technological capabilities to stop the rotation of planets! You're just another animal with extraordinary traits. Like every other chemical reaction classified as life on this tiny blue pixel in the universe. This, by the way, does not justify rape nor it does justify accusing a gender of supporting such action |
|
|
|
Post by yoritomo on May 27, 2011 12:33:49 GMT
Just so you guys know (and I use the term guys in the third person, gender neutral way; I wouldn't want to seem like a rape-supporter) I an leaning towards locking this thread. While all this discussion about animals and man is fascinating, it is also way off topic at this point.
If you want to continue the discussion please start a new thread for it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hellbreaker on May 27, 2011 23:20:09 GMT
Just so you guys know (and I use the term guys in the third person, gender neutral way; I wouldn't want to seem like a rape-supporter) I an leaning towards locking this thread. While all this discussion about animals and man is fascinating, it is also way off topic at this point. If you want to continue the discussion please start a new thread for it. One can safely say that the original topic is far from relevant at this time. I wouldn't put any money on this thread getting back on track. |
|
|
|
Post by wisdomseyes1 on May 27, 2011 23:38:35 GMT
Well, the topic on evolution actually started because of a genetic difference between man and woman conversation. It isn't THAT far off topic if we stick solely to that aspect...
|
|
|
|
Post by Hellbreaker on May 27, 2011 23:50:20 GMT
Well, the topic on evolution actually started because of a genetic difference between man and woman conversation. It isn't THAT far off topic if we stick solely to that aspect... In a normal conversation I can start talking about the previous math test, then it evolves into a discussion about whether green or red apples are the tastiest. Doesn't mean it has anything to do with the original topic.  I don't see what a discussion about the difference between humans and other animals have to do with supporting rape. |
|
|
|
Post by wisdomseyes1 on May 28, 2011 0:46:08 GMT
That's not what i said. It went from, "Men do have genetic differences from women, but also have the same problems" to "Men have always oppressed women throughout history" to "evolution says that men and women are supposed to support these rolls, though they don't really have to"... then something about how humans spread so far so fast, and then a debate about evolution.
It really, if you think about it, didn't go that far. Though... For the original topic... my friends laughed :-) I don't know anyone who wouldn't.
"A man is a rape supporter if they are pro choice, because it makes women more avaliable"
"A man is a rape supporter if they are anti-abortion"
These 2 are RIGHT next to each other in the list, and, the author is male from what I hear (people keep saying "him") so... did he call himself a rape supporter as well? It is impossable for him to not fit these categories.
THOUGH! I don't believe this was serious. The comment at the bottom seemed more sarcastic and snotty than anything else. "Now, can any woman out there tell me if they know ANY male over the age of 18 that does not fall into this list" makes me believe that he knows that there are no people who fit this, and that was the point of the article.
|
|
|
|
Post by Alice on May 28, 2011 9:43:43 GMT
The more I think about the article, the more I think the author was, as one might say, trollin' ¬_¬
Why does being anti-abortion make you a rape-supporter? Actually, why are there no explanations for any of the points? If the person really cared about making their opinions understood, they'd explain why each one was added.
And it isn't even explained what a 'rape-supporter' even IS! Do they mean somebody who would commit rape if given the chance, someone who doesn't think rape is wrong, someone who thinks rape should be allowed? What does it even mean? It's a very vague description.
|
|
|
|
Post by t⊗theark on May 28, 2011 11:47:22 GMT
The more I think about the article, the more I think the author was, as one might say, trollin' ¬_¬ Why does being anti-abortion make you a rape-supporter? Actually, why are there no explanations for any of the points? If the person really cared about making their opinions understood, they'd explain why each one was added. And it isn't even explained what a 'rape-supporter' even IS! Do they mean somebody who would commit rape if given the chance, someone who doesn't think rape is wrong, someone who thinks rape should be allowed? What does it even mean? It's a very vague description. |
|
|
|
Post by Helonion on May 28, 2011 12:22:08 GMT
The more I think about the article, the more I think the author was, as one might say, trollin' ¬_¬ Why does being anti-abortion make you a rape-supporter? Actually, why are there no explanations for any of the points? If the person really cared about making their opinions understood, they'd explain why each one was added. And it isn't even explained what a 'rape-supporter' even IS! Do they mean somebody who would commit rape if given the chance, someone who doesn't think rape is wrong, someone who thinks rape should be allowed? What does it even mean? It's a very vague description. Probably just some crazy moron who spews forth things before every thinking of what the hell they just said. A "heat of the moment" moment of stupidity. Someone who is so full of themselves and into their opinion that they don't need proof to prove what ever they are saying because everyone else is wrong for not believing them on their lack of proof "proof". |
|
|
|
Post by Psychichobo on May 28, 2011 17:10:21 GMT
It definitely seems like someone with a genuine vendetta against men. Many of her points are taking a habit and constructing a kind of theory as to how that is a trait of a rapist.
Believing you have a type therefore means you have a preference for physical traits of a woman, and thus you're objectifying women by considering physical traits relevant, therefore you don't see women as human, but rather something to be used, therefore rape is permitted as objects are there to be used.
The sheer effort needed to draw out this conclusion from a simple habit is astonishing, as is the direct accusation of you being a rape-supporter.
It would've made much more sense to state how it CAN or COULD lead to such attitudes, or that encouragement of such things may lead to women being objectified, and therefore it's something to not be encouraged.
Instead however, she skips all that and assumes the worst.
|
|
|
|
Post by Alice on May 28, 2011 23:15:54 GMT
(Oh my gosh wow, I actually put a thread back ON topic, did you SEE that?! @_@)
Believing you have a type does not necessarily mean you have a prefernece for physical traits. It covers all traits. I know men who like loud bubbly girls over quiet withdrawn types. That's not a physical trait.
And having physical presences doesn't mean you see the woman as an object at all! I can only speak from a female perspective, but I believe it works both ways. For example, I prefer men with beards, but it doesn't mean I see him as an object. If you prefer girls with green eyes, it doesn't mean you see them as objects. It's just a preference. Everybody has different ones.
The author of the article only seems to be able to think from one point of view, or one side of the coin. She isn't even assuming the worst, she's just applying fanciful negativities to every aspect of human behaviour. I say human rather than male because most of her points could apply to anyone, not just men. If I fit those categories, am I a rape-supporter? I'm female. Does that make a difference?
It's rediculous.
|
|
|
|
Post by wisdomseyes1 on May 29, 2011 0:37:20 GMT
(Oh my gosh wow, I actually put a thread back ON topic, did you SEE that?! @_@) are people just ignoring my posts now? |
|
|
|
Post by Hellbreaker on May 29, 2011 1:22:57 GMT
(Oh my gosh wow, I actually put a thread back ON topic, did you SEE that?! @_@) Actually Yori put it back on topic. Technically anyway. |
|
|
|
Post by t⊗theark on May 29, 2011 1:55:08 GMT
How about guys? I've been objectified many a time. I guess it's harder for a woman to rape a man though. I'm actually thinking that this person was date raped. She was going out with a guy who thought she was hot, she was date raped and though it was because he thought she was hot that she thinks he degraded her to a piece of meat and got access to the internet.
|
|
|
|
Post by wisdomseyes1 on May 29, 2011 15:23:56 GMT
Without an instrument... I don't think a guy who is unwilling CAN be raped by a woman...
|
|
This web site is completely unofficial and in no way endorsed by Games Workshop Limited.
Adeptus Astartes, Age of Sigmar, Battlefleet Gothic, Black Flame, Black Library, the Black Library logo, BL Publishing, Blood Angels, Bloodquest, Blood Bowl, the Blood Bowl logo, The Blood Bowl Spike Device, Cadian, Catachan, the Chaos device, Cityfight, the Chaos logo, Citadel, Citadel Device, City of the Damned, Codex, Daemonhunters, Dark Angels, Dark Eldar, Dark Future, the Double-Headed/Imperial Eagle device, 'Eavy Metal, Eldar, Eldar symbol devices, Epic, Eye of Terror, Fanatic, the Fanatic logo, the Fanatic II logo, Fire Warrior, Forge World, Games Workshop, Games Workshop logo, Genestealer, Golden Demon, Gorkamorka, Great Unclean One, the Hammer of Sigmar logo, Horned Rat logo, Inferno, Inquisitor, the Inquisitor logo, the Inquisitor device, Inquisitor:Conspiracies, Keeper of Secrets, Khemri, Khorne, Kroot, Lord of Change, Marauder, Mordheim, the Mordheim logo, Necromunda, Necromunda stencil logo, Necromunda Plate logo, Necron, Nurgle, Ork, Ork skull devices, Sisters of Battle, Stormcast Enternals, Skaven, the Skaven symbol devices, Slaanesh, Space Hulk, Space Marine, Space Marine chapters, Space Marine chapter logos, Talisman, Tau, the Tau caste designations, Tomb Kings, Trio of Warriors, Twin Tailed Comet Logo, Tyranid, Tyrannid, Tzeentch, Ultramarines, Warhammer, Warhammer Historical, Warhammer Online, Warhammer 40k Device, Warhammer World logo, Warmaster, White Dwarf, the White Dwarf logo, and all associated marks, names, races, race insignia, characters, vehicles, locations, units, illustrations and images from the Blood Bowl game, the Warhammer world, the Talisaman world, Age of Sigmar and the Warhammer 40,000 universe are either ®, TM and/or © Copyright Games Workshop Ltd 1975-2020, variably registered in the UK and other countries around the world. Used without permission. No challenge to their status intended. All Rights Reserved to their respective owners.
