A man is a rape-supporter if
|
Post by Alice on May 22, 2011 6:52:08 GMT
I never said men run on lust. Teenagers (young male ) run on lust. Now really, there are perverts and there are teenagers. Ultimately - yes, we are programmed to have sex. I need oxygen, I need food, I need clean, I need orgasm. I think it's really fundamental, we are built to want to hump. there is a sexual need and acknowledging that we are built to want to hump doesn't make someone a raρe supporter. It's the fact that you specifically said 'male' teenagers. I didn't mean to go into such a big rant XD But I'm tired of hearing people say things like that. Surely you've seen female teenagers lusting over boys at school, or boybands, or teachers? We just tend to have more dignity than to spread naked pictures across our walls ...Although I have a feeling most probably would if they could get hold of them...
|
|
|
Post by t⊗theark on May 22, 2011 7:28:35 GMT
Yeah, but females mentally mature much master than males - this is well established and are mentally mature for sex far before a boy is. Sure they can lust- but it's far prevalent in young males.
|
|
|
Post by Dangeresque on May 22, 2011 8:23:32 GMT
^ Gah... personalised opinion passed off as objective. Me hates it.
According to this list... I am a rape-supporter around twelve times over. Rather than continue to ridicule and fruitlessly interpret the ideas of an illogical feminist... I'll just say "In for a dime, in for a dollar."
IZ RAPIN' TIME
|
|
|
Post by Tyrantor on May 22, 2011 9:34:42 GMT
|
|
|
Post by yoritomo on May 22, 2011 12:44:23 GMT
Yeah, sorry about that. Rape has been removed from the swear filter and should appear normally now.
As for why annihilation was used you would have to ask trygon, he is one who did it.
|
|
|
Post by The DeathJester on May 22, 2011 12:56:45 GMT
This topic isn't really suitable for this website.
|
|
|
Post by hivefleetcollossus on May 22, 2011 13:37:32 GMT
This topic isn't really suitable for this website. Don't be retarded.
haha J/k
|
|
|
Post by The Tomato on May 22, 2011 16:05:00 GMT
@dj: I thought so to. But since yori didnt close it I think it may be ok for some reason. Go ::General::!
Also, by this definition I know plenty of people who are just one y chromatid away from being the worst posible kind of violators.
|
|
|
Post by Helonion on May 22, 2011 17:43:03 GMT
Probably the context was used in a gamer speak, hence the odd change to annihilation. You rape someone in a game, you owned them.
She sounds like either she got hurt a lot or never dated. Or she is just a certain 5 letter word.
|
|
|
Post by hivefleetcollossus on May 22, 2011 18:07:41 GMT
...or she is just a certain 5 letter word. SILLY! ;D
|
|
|
Post by yoritomo on May 22, 2011 18:57:41 GMT
Contrary to popular belief I do not enjoy locking threads. I believe in giving threads a chance, until somebody screws it up.
This thread, as it pertains to the original article, is fine. So long as everybody stays close to the original post I have no problem with this thread.
That being said, there are a lot of ways this thread can go downhill very fast. If I feel it is starting to go downhill this thread will probably be deleted instead of locked. And if you feel somebody in this thread has gone too far then shoot me a PM and we'll find some way to work it out.
|
|
|
Post by carnogaunt on May 22, 2011 19:00:28 GMT
-He describes female anatomy in terms of penetration, or uses terms referencing the supposed “emptiness” of female anatomy when describing women.How would I be able to describe any anatomy whatsoever in terms of penetration? Her gaze penetrated my soul? OH wait, that's not anatomy, I'm lost. I don't mean to push this conversation into the gray area, but often in erotica a person (usually a male character or a narrator) will refer to another person's orifices as "holes," sometimes along with some type of prefix ("[blank]-holes"). The author of this blog chose the word "emptiness" as a euphemism. Anyway, depending on interpretation, I match around 5-15 of those 30 points. I wonder if that is enough for me to be considered a rape-supporter in her eyes.
|
|
|
Post by Helonion on May 22, 2011 19:03:59 GMT
-He describes female anatomy in terms of penetration, or uses terms referencing the supposed “emptiness” of female anatomy when describing women.How would I be able to describe any anatomy whatsoever in terms of penetration? Her gaze penetrated my soul? OH wait, that's not anatomy, I'm lost. I don't mean to push this conversation into the gray area, but often in erotica a person (usually a male character or a narrator) will refer to another person's orifices as "holes," sometimes along with some type of prefix ("[blank]-holes"). The author of this blog chose the word "emptiness" as a euphemism. Anyway, depending on interpretation, I match around 5-15 of those 30 points. I wonder if that is enough for me to be considered a rape-supporter in her eyes. Her sarcasm at the end of trying to find someone who isn't on that list screams she thinks ALL men are rape supports.
|
|
|
Post by mina on May 22, 2011 20:53:18 GMT
All men are? What Serendipity!
Seriously though, I agree with Alice, saying that all young men act that way just makes them think it is okay. Seriously, they need to grow the hell up and realize jsut because they have raging hormones it isn't much of an excuse since clearly women manage to control theirs.
|
|
|
Post by t⊗theark on May 22, 2011 21:47:15 GMT
I never said it's okay either! Holy (please do not swear), this ideal just reinforces this point that many girl mature faster than boys. Not a hard concept!
It's not universal but it's usually the case. How about the girl who has a reputation for being a "$lut"? usually people know one - that's a counter to this claim but usually girls develop faster than boys physically and mental development is faster than this again. I'm not saying raging teen douchebags are okay.
|
|
This web site is completely unofficial and in no way endorsed by Games Workshop Limited.
Adeptus Astartes, Age of Sigmar, Battlefleet Gothic, Black Flame, Black Library, the Black Library logo, BL Publishing, Blood Angels, Bloodquest, Blood Bowl, the Blood Bowl logo, The Blood Bowl Spike Device, Cadian, Catachan, the Chaos device, Cityfight, the Chaos logo, Citadel, Citadel Device, City of the Damned, Codex, Daemonhunters, Dark Angels, Dark Eldar, Dark Future, the Double-Headed/Imperial Eagle device, 'Eavy Metal, Eldar, Eldar symbol devices, Epic, Eye of Terror, Fanatic, the Fanatic logo, the Fanatic II logo, Fire Warrior, Forge World, Games Workshop, Games Workshop logo, Genestealer, Golden Demon, Gorkamorka, Great Unclean One, the Hammer of Sigmar logo, Horned Rat logo, Inferno, Inquisitor, the Inquisitor logo, the Inquisitor device, Inquisitor:Conspiracies, Keeper of Secrets, Khemri, Khorne, Kroot, Lord of Change, Marauder, Mordheim, the Mordheim logo, Necromunda, Necromunda stencil logo, Necromunda Plate logo, Necron, Nurgle, Ork, Ork skull devices, Sisters of Battle, Stormcast Enternals, Skaven, the Skaven symbol devices, Slaanesh, Space Hulk, Space Marine, Space Marine chapters, Space Marine chapter logos, Talisman, Tau, the Tau caste designations, Tomb Kings, Trio of Warriors, Twin Tailed Comet Logo, Tyranid, Tyrannid, Tzeentch, Ultramarines, Warhammer, Warhammer Historical, Warhammer Online, Warhammer 40k Device, Warhammer World logo, Warmaster, White Dwarf, the White Dwarf logo, and all associated marks, names, races, race insignia, characters, vehicles, locations, units, illustrations and images from the Blood Bowl game, the Warhammer world, the Talisaman world, Age of Sigmar and the Warhammer 40,000 universe are either ®, TM and/or © Copyright Games Workshop Ltd 1975-2020, variably registered in the UK and other countries around the world. Used without permission. No challenge to their status intended. All Rights Reserved to their respective owners.