Tyranids in 6th (3++ Article)

[Geneva]

Seeing as we're all still in a big curfuffle as to what 6th edition means for Nids, I thought this article might be well appreciated. There's nothing here that probably hasn't already been mentioned on a thread somewhere on the forum already but it's a really nice, concise and in depth analysis that's definitely worth reading. Especially as a lot of us are still trying to wrap our heads around the new rulebook and the general meta not yet being fully established.

www.3plusplus.net/2012/07/tyranids-in-6th-edition-initial.html

I still think Biomancy is the key to making Tervigons a multi-role offensive unit but I'll leave that for you guys to decide. Cheers!

[coredump]

I tracked down the article he was referring to. It is super lame...

I suspect that 90% of the posters at this site (Including a lot of the newer ones) could made better lists...

www.belloflostsouls.net/2012/07/40k-point-counterpoint-on-tyranids.html

[Geneva]

Yeah, it looked like someone just randomly typed down the first few things off of the top of their head and called it a day. There's a lot more to be gleamed from the comments than the post itself. I could probably do something similar for Black Templars despite not being familiar with their codex. It wouldn't be very useful but it would be about as good.

[Davor]

Sadly, BoLS has become like GW WD, batt reps. Stuff just thrown in, without much real though going on. I use to love that site so much, but it seems to have gone downhill as of late.