6th Edition Leak

[mikepassal]

Would I be allowed to post a leaked version of the 6th Edition rules and codex updates, or would that be violating some agreement or the other? If I'm allowed to post it, I will.

[greatescape13]

I think there would be a difference between the following:

"Hey guys, I saw leaked photos of the new White Dwarf pages about 6th edition over on the 40k Apoc Blog. Check it out: apocalypse40k.blogspot.com/

and

"Wassup leetzors, found the hacked version of the pdf rules for free at PirateStealsMcDownloads.com. Check it out: www.youtube.com/watch?v=sxf2KCSyvgQ

More toward the former and less like the latter is probably appropriate, at least toward my sensibilities on the matter.

Cheers.

[Voice of Reason]

@greatescape: should be url=http
cheers

[mikepassal]

Well in that case I'll just point out what I found most interesting, which is a significant change to using your own units as cover. Now every hit avoided by the unit in back is taken by the unit in front.

[emoge]

That and the "leak" you found is likely the "leaked" rules that have been online for about 6 months now and we've already hashed the majority of it in other threads.

[Inquisitor Stingray]

What emoge said. It's likely the so called pancake-edition.

[greatescape13]

Jun 21, 2012 20:15:41 GMT Voice of Reason said:

@greatescape: should be url=http
cheers

Yeah, I'm surprisingly bad at the internet for someone who is still relatively young-ish.

Heh.

[coredump]

Lets keep leaks and rumors in the rumor thread pls.

And pretty sure this is an old 'leak' of very dubious origins.