New jurrasic park(world) trailer

[Bot]

I've known for some years that they were working on a 4th movie, but now that the trailer is here I'm not sure it's going to be a good thing. I'm almost kind of expecting it to be worse than the third movie they made... I still loved the first and second movie though. Here's the trailer.

[ZergLord]

Nov 25, 2014 17:35:55 GMT Bot said:

I've known for some years that they were working on a 4th movie, but now that the trailer is here I'm not sure it's going to be a good thing.

So I'm not the only guy who thinks this, right?

I'm not looking forward to this, at all. And this comes from the guy who's best movie of all time is Jurassic Park, and who likes JP2 despite being extremely flawed.

5 seconds into the trailer and I already have a problem with this movie. Where are you two going? Uh-oh...
35 seconds in and I'm already having a bad feeling about this project. Oh no, is that a JP\JW gate?... Haven't they already learned that a park with living breathing "dinosaurs" is a bad idea? Derp, 4th time's a charm!

Can't really judge the CGI at this moment, but CGI looks pretty average for a JP movie. That shark looks awfully fake. At least they didn't want to kill a real shark for this movie.

And what's up with the end? Did the guy smear himself with Raptor pheromones and tricked them into thinking he's one of them? Not to mention that the actor isn't composited very good with the CGI.

At least they can't make this worse than JP3. JP3 was all about special effects and nothing more.

[Inquisitor Stingray]

Oh, you're far from the only one thinking this. Not getting my expectations up at all, no movie spends some ten years in development hell and ends up being anything more than tolerable. I have a bad feeling about this. Also, the people-at-a-pool-reacting-to-questionable-CGI reminds me of Piranha 3D more than anything. Coupled with the Prometheus-like 'BUUUUARGH' sound.

[jackedup]

Be thankful that they didn't go with the *original* JP4 idea. In the original script, the story involved human - dinosaur hybrids, which would fight the dinosaurs that had managed to leave the island. They even went so far as to get the concept art done. Here:

geektyrant.com/news/2012/10/10/jurassic-park-4-crazy-dino-human-hybrid-concept-art.html

[Exocrine NzL]

I for one am looking forward to this movie I really liked the first three. Dinosaurs were my childhood.

[Moontyranid]

im not having high hopes but im gona watch it.

[gman25639]

The whole point of this new one is years later when they've finally worked out the kinks and opened the parks without dinosaurs murdering people. And the trained Raptors?! OMG yes! Seems feasible really these things were like the wolves of their time and we domesticated wolves. From an article I read the new monster is some sort of mutant hybrid they tried to make and they lost control of it. This is gonna be a fun movie at least, seems pretty good to me!

[Bot]

Dec 2, 2014 7:03:11 GMT gman25639 said:

And the trained Raptors?! OMG yes! Seems feasible really these things were like the wolves of their time and we domesticated wolves.

[Inquisitor Stingray]

^That get's better everytime I watch it, Bot. Movie still sounds questionable to say the least, but that never meant I wasn't going to see it.

[angelwing]

I'll end up watching it I think, but not at the cinema. In terms of how good it will be, I'm thinking Jaws 3 after watching the first 2 Jaws films.

[snowdaman]

I am looking forward to seeing it always loved dinosaurs. that said hope for the best and expect the worst lol.

also when I hear of the hybrid dinosaur. i think they crossed a t rex with a raptor. the size and power of a rex with the intelligence and speed (arms lol) of a raptor

Sent from my GT-I9100M using proboards

[blackrainbow]

The aquatic one eating the shark lost me (though who reallllly has high hopes going into this). The amount of water needed to house that beast, much less give it room to get up to speed to make that jump is obscene, not even considering the amount of food that thing would require every day. As far as the whole theme park used to generate cash flow for research that then allows you to take tour buses and clear spheres amongst dinosaurs - hell yes! But as a movie, naw. This does look like a good bad-movie night renter.

That being said, I think I'll re-read (4th time) Raptor Red. That is a greatly entertaining book that I highly recommend to everyone.
www.amazon.com/Raptor-Robert-Bakker-published-Bantam/dp/B00E32PH0O/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1421808428&sr=8-2&keywords=raptor+red

[arapaima]

Mosasaurs man I'm HYPED.

[BattleMetalChris]

WHERE ARE THE FEATHERS?


I *loved* JP1. That movie was my Star Wars, the first film I saw as a kid that left me completely spellbound. Hearing the music today never fails to give me goosebumps.


By far the most disappointing thing for me is, given how much more has been discovered about dinosaurs since 1993; and how groundbreakingly real and 'now' all the dinosaurs in jp1 were at the time; how all the dinos in the trailer look like stuff that's in books from the 1970s.

The big 'thing' about jp1 was that for the first time, dinosaurs were transformed from skeletons in a museum, or awkward plastic reconstructions, or pictures in a book, into living, breathing, believable *animals*. 25 years of research has now led to the widely accepted belief that almost all dinosaurs (certainly almost all therapods) had feathers and were more closely related to birds than reptiles; to see them as just grey lizards is a bit of kick in the balls to all that and to what captured me about jp1.

There's even a handy crutch in the plot to explain why the new dinosaurs wouldn't look like the ones from jp1 & 2 - in the first batch, they used frog DNA to fill in the gene sequence. "ahaha", they could say, "we now know dinosaurs are more closely related to birds so we tried bird DNA instead, and that's why the dinos in the new park look so much closer to the real thing."#



I'm still going to go and watch the (please do not swear) out of it though.

Look at me, I've turned into Abby from JSPowerHour again.

[Inquisitor Stingray]

I don't know about that. Don't mean to be picky, but there are some confusing parts about your argumentation. Was it the dinosaurs being dinosaurs and thereby awesome that captured you as a kid or the scientific accuracy of their portrayal? Because I reckon there's been some hefty debate about all of that ever since the original hit the cinemas. From incorrect naming (Deinonychus being called Velociraptors because it sounded more vicious) to those acid-spitting reptiles, I think the original movie has a far amount of issues as well. My palentology is lackluster to say the least, but are any of the larger sauropods believed to have been feathered?

And I agree, I feel very much about Jurassic Park like you do and like someone who was a child in the seventies must feel about Star Wars. And I will watch this movie, hopefully enjoy it as well. It will be difficult not to. Dinosaurs, after all. Heard some rumors (Super Bowl trailer lends some credence to them) that the reason the dinosaurs were so aggressive in the original movies was due to them never having a proper father/mother figure to 'teach' them their behavior. Chris Pratts supposedly fills in this role, as is implied in the scene where he rides along the raptors. Of course the new dinosaur (Indominus Rex, I think it's called) has the same issues.

It's late.