JJ ABRAMS TO DIRECT THE NEW STAR WARS MOVIE

[Helonion]

insidemovies.ew.com/2013/01/24/j-j-abrams-star-wars-director/

I don't know how to feel about this..........

[t⊗theark]

[Loplod]

Oh boy.. here comes another terrible plot twist featuring shiny blue lights

hopefully he doesn't botch it, but I don't hold high hopes personally. they should have gotten michael bay (not srs)

[Trygon]

Considering how offensively bad the prequels were, anyone could do a better job at this point.

[Bot]

Am I really the only one who liked the prequels?

[Helonion]

Feb 2, 2013 20:22:26 GMT Bot said:

Am I really the only one who liked the prequels?

I liked them! Originals always tend to win but at least we know the plot to the originals now. To be fair Anakin was a whiny (please do not swear).

[Loplod]

Feb 2, 2013 20:22:26 GMT Bot said:

Am I really the only one who liked the prequels?

I liked the prequels back in the day, haven't watched them for ages but the effects were nice. Never liked the originals so much because of age and bad effects (can still appreciate them)

At least this one won't be animated <3

[Psychichobo]

The prequels were alright, but they were kid's movies really.

[t⊗theark]

Feb 4, 2013 23:32:17 GMT Psychichobo said:

The prequels were alright, but they were kid's movies really.

I could see that, That's why is had forced amputations, evisceration, implied rape, child murder, more child murder and a child murderer burning and suffering at the bank of a river of lava.

[Helonion]

Feb 5, 2013 1:06:20 GMT t⊗theark said:

Feb 4, 2013 23:32:17 GMT Psychichobo said:

The prequels were alright, but they were kid's movies really.

I could see that, That's why is had forced amputations, evisceration, implied rape, child murder, more child murder and a child murderer burning and suffering at the bank of a river of lava.

Just Remember, they are Disney movies now XD

[Squire]

Feb 5, 2013 1:06:20 GMT t⊗theark said:

Feb 4, 2013 23:32:17 GMT Psychichobo said:

The prequels were alright, but they were kid's movies really.

I could see that, That's why is had forced amputations, evisceration, implied rape, child murder, more child murder and a child murderer burning and suffering at the bank of a river of lava.

Implied rape? I'd never noticed that. Do you mean the sand people and Anakin's mum? That would make sense I suppose

[t⊗theark]

Feb 5, 2013 12:55:52 GMT Squire said:

Feb 5, 2013 1:06:20 GMT t⊗theark said:

I could see that, That's why is had forced amputations, evisceration, implied rape, child murder, more child murder and a child murderer burning and suffering at the bank of a river of lava.

Implied rape? I'd never noticed that. Do you mean the sand people and Anakin's mum? That would make sense I suppose

That's the scene I was refering to.

[Overread]

Lets not forget implied incest in the original trilogy

[Raven]

I like the prequels, people give them a lot of flak about the midichlorians, Jar Jar, and Anakin's acting, but I think a) ok, midichlorians are stupid but they really don't impact the movies at all despite being a convenient way of having Anakin's potential be recognised and they could have just as easily had them sense his potential through the force. b) The Prequels had Jar Jar but the originals had Ewoks. c) While Anakin came across as whiny, Mark Hamill did not do a good job as Luke, he was very bland. d) Yes, the originals have Harrison Ford but the prequels have both Liam Neeson and Samuel L. Jackson. d) Revenge of the Sith was awesome and I challenge anyone who disagrees to a duel.

I'm apprehensive about Disney and J.J. Abrams doing the next 3, I think it's really a coin flip as to whether they'll make them well or fail horribly.

P.S. They should have force ghost Qui Gon as an excuse to get Liam Neeson in there.