Tyrannofex questions

[Psychichobo]

Pff, Beauty is for Eldar. And I LOVE smooshing those clowns.

Thing is, they love to try and go for it with things like Fire Dragons. New Cover rules should be helpful with that.

[bloodborne]

and that puts them in range for a world of hurt too... lol

[Deleted]

Aug 9, 2012 8:42:21 GMT free said:

...but they are so ugly it hurts

Get a Biovore model to look at whenever you find yourself thinking the Tfex ugly and suddenly you will see him in a new light!

Just realized the Rupture Cannon got super nerfed in 6e. With only a 6 on damage results being a wreck its already poor odds just got cut in half. They changed ap1/2 to +2/1 to damage results to even it out since AT is typically AP1/2 but not the Rupture Cannon. I wouldn't take a Rupture Cannon if it deducted points now. It has a 1/24 chance of wrecking av14.

[maskedtyranid]

Yeah, that's the problem with the TFex w/Rupture Cannon now. I've praised it before but with a lower chance of instantly destroying a vehicle it's not what it's cracked up to be anymore. If GW's not going to up the AP value to at least 2, then they need to reduce an RC Tfex's point cost. But, then, we'd probably need someone that isn't Cruddance to be writing the codex for that to happen.

[aihtin]

I like using acid my self. I treat my T-fex more as a monster Hellhound with acid instead of fire. It dose need a lot of back up to do thing however and is mostly good against orks and other nids due to the number of models it can hit at one time. Also like others have said the BS dose not matter with the acid and if I am going to put that many points into a model your damn sure I am going to make sure it hits things.