Rending Vehicles

[Jabberwocky]

I've seen a few times people saying our rends get AP2 against vehicles. I'm reading the entry and by RAW it seems we don't.

It says when wounding in combat, AP2.

When wounding in shooting, AP2.

Then it says 'in either case, a 6 on a vehicle grants another D3'.

In my mind that says the effect on vehicles in shooting and combat is +D3. No mention of AP2.

Anyone seen anything suggesting otherwise? As far as I can see this is exactly like 5th ed.

[coredump]

You seem to be correct.....

[killme304]

Great, another nerf. Just read the entry, it does not mention AP2 vs vehicles *prays for a FAQ*

[creep]

Not that bad... since you can glance vehicles to death with gargoyles and Hormies (Adrenal glands)
and wont have a MC inflicting 3 stunned/Weapon destroyed/shaken results anymore against a rhino doing nothing.
you also always hit on 3+ or automatic

You don't have problems with killing Tanks anymore

[Jabberwocky]

It's not a terrible problem as explosions tend to kill vehicles. I'm happy hull-point-wrecking them.

Just wanted to clarify the rule.

[Inquisitor Stingray]

Jul 2, 2012 20:35:47 GMT creep said:

Not that bad... since you can glance vehicles to death with gargoyles and Hormies (Adrenal glands)
and wont have a MC inflicting 3 stunned/Weapon destroyed/shaken results anymore against a rhino doing nothing.
you also always hit on 3+ or automatic

You don't have problems with killing Tanks anymore

Still, it's another nail in the coffin of Genestealers.

[creep]

they bring a broodlord

try to field 10 psykers give all of them telepathy

watch 4 or 5 units do nothing each turn if you just have the basic spell (4-5 due to the 6+ ward save against psyker stuff)

6 Broodlords 2 HQ Tervs + 9 Zoans army anyone?

[immortalblue]

Where does it say attacking a vehicle is not close combat?

Sent from my GT-I9300 using ProBoards

[Davor]

I am talking about the "to wound" part. Since we don't wounds on vehicles, there is no "re-roll" on that part.